Archived source — recreation of How to: Fly Synapse (Kyle Willie, 2026). · Open the live original ↗ · Retrieved 2026-05-27. Point-in-time snapshot.

How to: Fly Synapse

Recreation from source (15 pages) — rendered images with extracted text. Editable original via the source link above.

page 1
Page 1 of 15
Page text
1 
 
How to: Fly Synapse 
 
Table of Contents: 
 
Indicators 
Shapes 
Vesicles 
Synaptic Clefts/Gaps 
T Bars 
Postsynaptic Density 
Tracing Method 
Top-Down/Surfacing synapses 
 
 
Indicators 
 
●​ Synapses have four possible indicators: one primary, and three secondary. 
○​ Dense cluster of vesicles  
○​ Synaptic cleft 
○​ T-bar 
○​ PSD 
●​ For a synapse to be vetted, the primary indicator (i.e. dense vesicles) must be present, 
as well at least two of the secondary indicators. 
●​ What follows is a how-to guide on how to recognize and annotate synapses in fly data.
page 2
Page 2 of 15
Page text
2 
Shapes 
 
Just as in previous mammalian or fish data, fly synapses comprise a presynaptic axonal body 
and a postsynaptic dendritic or axonal body. Spines branch off from large dendritic bodies and 
into spine-heads to come up against and receive information from axons. Large, non-spine, 
dendritic bodies as well as large axonal bodies can also facilitate synapses. In previous 
datasets, we are used to seeing axons with relatively clear trajectories, swelling and shrinking 
as they move from one side of the bounding box to another, and moderate to large dendrites 
with clear spines. In fly data, we see something a little different.  
 
 
Fig.1: Large shot. 
 
In Fig. 1 we see a congregation of amorphously shaped axons, dendrites and multicellular 
bodies. Axons are generally large sweeping structures that branch and pinch as they move 
throughout the set. Dendritic branches can be just as large and sweeping, often looking very 
similar in form to the axons around them. What is distinct here are the shapes of the spine 
heads and the way they interact with axons. In previous datasets, spines could often look 
identical to non-bouton sections of axons, both appearing as small circular shapes in EM. In fly, 
by contrast, spines seem to be the only objects that take on a small circular shape. They are 
often grouped together and surround axons from many sides and in large numbers.
page 3
Page 3 of 15
Page text
3 
 
Fig. 2: Cluster of dendritic spines. 
 
Fig. 3: Cluster of synapsing spin heads.
page 4
Page 4 of 15
Page text
4 
Vesicles 
 
 
A dense cluster of vesicles is one of the indicators that should be present in an 
identified synapse. As far as we’ve seen in fly, such clusters should be easy to spot in 
reasonably clear data, making them a good thing to look for when annotating synapses. In the 
Fig. below, how many axons can you spot with dense vesicle grouping? 
 
Fig. 4: Entire bounding box
page 5
Page 5 of 15
Page text
5 
 
Fig. 5: Entire bounding box-2. 
 
It’s important to note the difference between vesicles that are accumulating around a synaptic 
area, and vesicles that are hanging out near a border. The Fig.s below show an area in two 
sequential slices. Note the dense accumulation forming near the synaptic spine heads marked 
red in comparison to the vesicles around the dendrite marked green. 
  
 
Fig. 6 & 7: comparative density. 
 
 
This second but similar example even has a darkened area around the green dendrite. 
However, notice the difference in cluster size and density between the two regions. While there
page 6
Page 6 of 15
Page text
6 
may be some cases where a small, dark formation as seen in Fig. 9, could indicate a possible 
synapse, here we see no other indicators that would be necessary for annotation. 
 
 
 
Fig. 8 & 9: comparative density.
page 7
Page 7 of 15
Page text
7 
Synaptic Clefts/Gaps 
 
Aside from dense clusters of vesicles, widened synaptic clefts/gaps should be the easiest to 
spot. While PSDs can often look identical to a general border, clefts in fly data comprise what 
often appears as a thin sliver of space between the presynaptic axonal body and the 
postsynaptic dendritic body. Because the gaps are predominantly thin, the darkness of its 
borders and the activity of the synapse bleeds over, making these areas dark and relatively 
easy to spot. Below are some examples. Clefts are the foremost indicator of synapses in fly, and 
there are common cases where the only indicator that two bodies are synapsing is that they are 
both touching the same cleft. 
 
 
Fig. 1 & 2: Clear example of a cleft in sequential slides.
 
Fig. 3: Multiple clefts.
page 8
Page 8 of 15
Page text
8 
 
 
False Clefts(?) 
 
Sometimes you’ll see thin segments that can look like a synaptic cleft but aren’t. In the example 
video below we follow a cleft through 9 slides. Notice how the area exhibits all the signs of a 
synapse (cleft, PSD, vesicles, T-bar) but at the transition from slide 6 to 7, we see the cleft drop 
away and a different segment come up in its place, now lacking any sign of a synapse. 
 
False cleft example 
 
 
 
 
Fig. 1 - 4: Show a synaptic cleft disappear and a segment take its place.
page 9
Page 9 of 15
Page text
9 
T Bars 
 
T bars appear as dark objects along the membrane and within the vesicle cluster of a 
presynaptic axon. Of everything in that area, they are the darkest in color. Though the name 
indicates a T-like shape, they come in a variety of shapes. Below are some examples, starting 
with a couple of ideal T-bars. 
 
Fig. 1 & 2: Perfect T-bar. 
 
 
Fig. 3 & 4: Perfect T-bar. 
 
​ ​
 
Fig. 5 & 6: Imperfect T-bars.
page 10
Page 10 of 15
Page text
10 
Postsynaptic Density 
 
The postsynaptic density is a dark or shaded area that appears in the dendritic body at a 
synapse point. In previous datasets, this indicator has been relatively prominent and easy to 
spot, but in fly data its prominence varies. Below are some examples, starting with a few that 
are more apparent, followed by some that are a little harder to see. 
 
 
Fig. 1: Prominent PSD. Notice how the membrane on the postsynaptic side of the cleft 
bumps up in places, indicating an area of darkness beyond the parameters of the 
membrane.  
 
 
Fig. 2: Mixed prominency PSD. Notice how the PSD of the three dendrites on the left look 
similar to those in Fig. 1, while the two on the right are less prominent.
page 11
Page 11 of 15
Page text
11 
 
Fig. 3: Comparative PSD. The red arrow indicates a PSD, while the green arrow indicates 
a border that, due or organelles or an issue with the data, looks very similar to a PSD. 
 
While being an indicator that you should consider in your selection process, PSD should 
probably not be the indicator you look for first, due to the variance in clarity.
page 12
Page 12 of 15
Page text
12 
 
Tracing Method 
 
Now that we’ve outlined what each of the indicators looks like and how they can be identified, 
we can move onto what the annotation process is like. Once a synapse is located and 
confirmed, annotating the parts involved is a quick and easy process. There are annotation 4 
categories, and therefore 4 different segments should be used: Cleft/Gap/PSD, T-bar, Uncertain 
Cleft/Gap/PSD, Uncertain T-bar. The two uncertain categories are self explanatory: if you are 
uncertain about either a cleft or a T-bar, you mark it with the appropriate uncertain segment 
color.  
 
Fig. 1: Segment tree. 
 
Clefts that you are certain of should be annotated with a simple line that extends the length of 
the cleft. as follows:
page 13
Page 13 of 15
Page text
13 
 
Fig. 2: Annotated Cleft. Arrows indicate the end points of the cleft. 
 
You do not need to worry about covering all of the pixels that make up the cleft, or even 
changing the size of the brush to match the thickness of the cleft, but attention should be paid to 
prevent extending the length of the annotation to include membrane that isn’t part of the 
synapse. Below are two comparative Fig.s: One that demonstrates over-segmentation of clefts, 
and one that demonstrates correct segmentation. 
 
 
Fig. 3: Over-segmentation/bridging distance between clefts. 
 
Fig. 4: Correct Segmentation.
page 14
Page 14 of 15
Page text
14 
T-bars should be annotated by replicating the shape of the T-bar regardless of shape. As 
mentioned earlier in this document, sometimes T-bars actually look like a T, but often they are 
various shapes. Either way, it’s important to replicate that shape within reason. The annotation 
does not have to be pixel perfect. 
 
 
Fig. 5: T-bar annotation.
page 15
Page 15 of 15
Page text
15 
 
Top-Down/Surfacing synapses 
 
There’s a fair chance that the majority of synapses that you will encounter will be lateral, as all 
previous examples in this document have been. But sometimes you will come upon synapses 
that are more vertical. These instances involve progressing through the the Z plane to uncover 
the cleft and T-bar that are revealed once the postsynaptic bodies have moved out of the way, 
kind of like digging in the sand. 
 
Fig. 6: Top-down synapse. The postsynaptic dendritic bodies are marked here in green. Notice how they disperse as 
the axon comes up from below. Can you spot the cleft and T-bar? 
 
   
Fig. 7: Top-down synapse with cleft and T-bar labeled.